“What made you to reason that there was no suspect in the murder,” Charles Ondieki, the officer postured.
Mr Maobe answered that confirmation assembled from witnesses couldn’t connect a suspect with the demise of Careen. He additionally presented that when the choice to forward the case to the DPP was made, he had not got a report from the digital wrongdoing unit on a portable workstation and cell phones recovered from Careen’s condo.
An administration investigator’s report of tests taken from Mr Otieno’s body and that of the expired was arranged a year ago however the specimens were sent in 2012.
Ms Ann Wangechi Nderitu, from the administration scientist, said the report uncovered nail cutting indicated to be from Otieno’s body were really from Careen.
“The nail tests set apart as that of the presume walked those set apart as of the perished,” Ms Nderitu affirmed.
She ascribed the postponement in setting up the answer to under staffing and absence of chemicals in the administration scientific expert.